Behind the Executive Orders
vruz:
via Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Dish / The Atlantic
Saniity Prevailed
During the transition period, unknown to the public, Obama’s legal, intelligence, and national-security advisers visited Langley for two long sessions with current and former intelligence-community members. They debated whether a ban on brutal interrogation practices would hurt their ability to gather intelligence, and the advisers asked the intelligence veterans to prepare a cost-benefit analysis. The conclusions may surprise defenders of harsh interrogation tactics. “There was unanimity among Obama’s expert advisers,” Craig said, “that to change the practices would not in any material way affect the collection of intelligence.”
Behind that pseudo-toughness was pseudo-security.
Post Notes
-
friendopportunity liked this
-
minorjive reblogged this from vruz
-
vruz posted this


