vruz:

by Jane Mayer, The New Yorker

via Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Dish / The Atlantic

Saniity Prevailed

During the transition period, unknown to the public, Obama’s legal, intelligence, and national-security advisers visited Langley for two long sessions with current and former intelligence-community members. They debated whether a ban on brutal interrogation practices would hurt their ability to gather intelligence, and the advisers asked the intelligence veterans to prepare a cost-benefit analysis. The conclusions may surprise defenders of harsh interrogation tactics. “There was unanimity among Obama’s expert advisers,” Craig said, “that to change the practices would not in any material way affect the collection of intelligence.”

Behind that pseudo-toughness was pseudo-security.

1 year ago Comments | Permalink | 2 notes
vruzReblogged from united colours of vruz

Post Notes

  1. minorjive reblogged this from vruz
  2. vruz posted this
blog comments powered by Disqus